![]() The 330 has a slightly slimmer neck to that the 360. The model’s neck is relatively thin, as Rickenbacker guitars generally are, whereas some guitarists prefer this, others may not. With a low action, you may find the Rickenbacker 330 a little tricky to play at first if you’re used to some tension. ![]() It’s a versatile instrument, crafted to play vintage sounds how they deserve to be played. The Rickenbacker 330 has incredible playability, with twin truss rod adjustment, which could take some time for newer players to grips with. Next, we’re going to look into the two models more closely. The two guitars are both from Rickenbackers 300 series and are highly similar, almost identical in many ways, so it can help see a side-by-side comparison. The brand has its forum where genuine fanatics have compared the two models. Rickenbacker 330 and Rickenbacker 360 – Key Specifications SpecificationsĮxploring Rickenbacker 330 and Rickenbacker 360 The Rickenbacker 360′ overall length is 39 ½ inches, whereas the Rickenbacker 330 has the size of 39 ¾ inches.The Rickenbacker 360 output type is mono, whereas the Rickenbacker 330 output type is mono and stereo.The Rickenbacker 360 Fret Marker style is dots, whereas the Rickenbacker 330 has triangles.The Rickenbacker 360 doesn’t have neck binding, whereas the Rickenbacker 330 does.The main differences between the Rickenbacker 330 vs the 360 are: Image from Flickr Main Differences Between the Rickenbacker 330 vs 360
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |